FRBA Nav Redesign

S61C Mobile Redesign

Atlanta Fed.


Web Navigation Redesign

UX Design Research Intern 
@ Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
May 2022 - August 2022

Project Overview

Design Context

I joined the Public Affairs Department at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta as a UX Design Research Intern. I led the redesign of the Atlanta Fed website navigation. I intentionally ensured the involvement of stakeholders and users throughout the design process. At the end of my 10-week internship, I delivered an improved navigation system that ensures content discovery and findability while highlighting the Atlanta Fed’s “bread and butter”

Key Skills: Qualitative and quantitative data analysis, stakeholder co-design, Information architecture testing, wireframing, usability testing

Product Phases & My Contributions

*Product phase(s) in gray indicates the phase(s) happened before or after my internship

 

Impact of My Work

  • Delivered clickable wireframes demonstrating the proposed new website navigation design

  • Design received approvals from the department head and relevant stakeholders

Performance Review from Department Director


My Design Process

Background

01. The Problem

Define
Design
Reflections

Current Challenges with the Atlanta Fed Website

The lack of consideration of user experience makes the Atlanta Fed’s website not approachable to the public. The disorganized information architecture and convoluted navigation created problems for external users who want to learn about the Fed and internal stakeholders who want to disseminate the Fed’s latest policy and economic update to the public.

Main issues with the current navigation design. Link to current website: https://www.atlantafed.org/

External User Painpoints

  • Scattered Content

  • Cluttered Content - No clear highlight on the Atlanta Fed’s bread and butter

  • Use of internal jargon and missing context

  • Usability - loaded dropdown menus

Internal User Painpoints

  • Buried content

  • Unsuccessful information dissemination


Background

Define

02. Vision and Goals
03. Design Priority

Design
Reflections

Vision & Goals

Business Goals *Defined by the advisory team of the bank

  • Ensure users view the Atlanta Fed as their primary source for economic and banking information

Redesign Goals

  • Formalize a content strategy that improves the quality of our work and gets rid of the stale, more confusing aspects of our website.

  • Prioritize user research and analytics to guide the development of our digital products


Design Priority: website navigation

  • Information Architecture

  • Content Grouping & Organization

  • Navigation Menu Design


Background
Define

Design

01. Content sorting
02. Themes and Labeling
03. Refine IA
04. Wireframing

Test & Launch
Reflections

The design process is collaborative and user-centered.

Collaborating with stakeholders (digital marketing, research department, engineers, and department reps who publish content on the site)

I conducted 3 internal stakeholder co-design workshops to leverage stakeholders’ institutional knowledge to ensure that the redesign highlights the bank’s priorities, and accurately conveys the bank’s message to the public in the correct terms and order.

Engaging with the public

In the meanwhile, I conducted 3 rounds of user research that engages with the public to understand their mental model on content navigation and identify knowledge gaps in terms of consuming banking and economy related information published by the bank

Design process: co-designing with stakeholders and users


Background
Define

Design

01. Content sorting

02. Themes and Labeling
03. Refine IA
04. Wireframing

Reflections

Bottom-up Content Sorting

UX methods used: site-mapping, card-sorting, stakeholder co-design

Site Mapping

The first step into revamping the site architecture was to vet current content and IA. I mapped out the entire site and identified the following issues:

  • The current site has over 100 pages and many of these pages lead to dead ends or loops

  • Each main menu tab leads to a department of the bank, and every department has different landing pages which disrupt the coherence of the site-browsing experience

  • The unnecessary landing pages add one more layer before reaching to main content. Therefore the depth of the information architecture makes the site experience cumbersome

Site map of the existing website, resulted in 100+ content pieces/ “cards“ to sort

External User Testing: Card sorting
We conducted card sorting sessions with external users of the Fed’s website, with the goal of understanding their mental model around browsing and finding content.

 

Stakeholder Co-design Workshop 01: card sorting and identifying thematic content groupings
We invited stakeholders from the digital strategy content team, research department, writers/ editors, and engineers who have been working on site migration to our first workshop, with the intention of leveraging their knowledge of the bank’s content to explore options for grouping existing content by topics and themes, instead of grouping by bank departments which has been proven ineffective for external users to understand and browse


Background
Define

Design

01. Content sorting
02. Themes and Labeling

03. Refine IA
04. Wireframing

Reflections

Deciding Menu Items and Labeling

UX methods used: qualitative and quantitative data analysis, preference testing, stakeholder co-design, affinity mapping

Stakeholder Co-design Workshop 02: brainstorm labelings for the identified content themes

 

Choosing and Naming Primary Menu Items

The second co-design workshop resulted in 12 themes as candidates for primary menus. I used two guiding questions to narrow down menu options that foregrounds users’ voice while giving voice to internal stakeholders to get their messages across to the public.

  • “What are the top tasks users seek to accomplish on our site?” — users’ needs

  • “What are the bread and butter of Atlanta Fed?” — stakeholders’ voice

To answer the two questions, I referred to the research data from three different sources:

 

Quantitative data
Google analytics: top tasks, most viewed pages

Qualitative data
External interviews, top tasks, personas, journey maps, 17 usability testing with existing site

Business needs
Internal interviews with key stakeholders including Raphael and Andrea (Bank President and VP)

 

Guided by research, the 12 themes were grouped once more into 3 categories: the bank’s latest publications (research, policy, news, etc..), knowledge archive, and public engagements.

Resulted from co-design workshop

Narrowing down to 3 thematical groups covering main publications, 2 types of databases, and 6 informational groups covering content related to public engagement

Rationales behind selected menu items

Content Category 1: Latest publications (including press-releases, research, data tools, articles, etc..)

It covers 3 key business areas, banking, economy, and community. This is the “bread and butter“ of the Atlanta Fed, 70% of site content falls under this category and “getting the latest update on our economy” is the top task of our users. Therefore, the three business areas become the primary menu items of the site.

Content Category 2: Knowledge Archives

The bank’s knowledge is published primarily in 2 distinct formats, one is an interactive data tool, and another one is in written form. Therefore, we identified 2 types of databases for users with alternatives to browsing and finding knowledge archives

Content Category 3: Public Engagements

The rest of the content is oriented toward public engagements that speak to different audiences, such as educators, policymakers, the press, and the general public. So to provide ease of access to audience-specific information, we broke the informational content into 6 categories, and they become the secondary menu items of the redesigned site.


Background
Define

Design

01. Content sorting
02. Themes and Labeling
03. Refine IA

04. Wireframing

Reflections


Background
Define

Design

01. Content sorting
02. Themes and Labeling
03. Refine IA
04. Wireframing

Reflections

Translating usability painpoints to design goals

Painpoints Addressed —>

Navigation Design Goals

The design of the navigation system should allow users to find specific content quickly, browse content based on individual needs, and discover newly promoted content

Prototyping Web Navigation

The nature of the website content is complex and diverse, therefore I experimented with 2 navigation designs that can host complex data and display an organized information hierarchy in one glance or within one click

Design Option 1: two-layer navigation

Evaluating Web Navigation Design Option 1

Design Option 2: Mega Menu Design

Evaluating Web Navigation Design Option 2


 

Background
Define
Design

Reflections

Final Thoughts

Internship highlight

Towards the end of my internship, I had the opportunity to present my work to the entire product team, and I received positive feedback on the final redesign and validated our assumption of my design: immediate access, discoverable, and information is digestible.

Skills advancement

  • This is my first end-to-end product design project, and it was rewarding to see my design being adopted and launched to the public

  • This project allowed me to practice skills ranging from foundational research, IA testing, IA design, wireframing, prototyping and UI design.

Cross-functional team collaboration

  • As an UXer on a start-up team, I wore the hat of a communicator, a translator and an educator. I learned to communicate research plan with stakeholders early on, translate research data to make a case for my design, and educate non-designers about the value of research-driven and user-centered design

Things I Learned About Myself

  • This internship allowed me to experience UX design with sprinkles of research and UI design. In this product design cycle, I found myself getting most excited about designing research plans, talking to users, and transforming a messy set of data into organized bullet points that guide tangible design decisions.

  • I am good at UI design work, and it’s therapeutic for me, but I found problem scoping, conducting research, data analysis, and communicating design concepts more intriguing and challenging.


Thank you!